Africanism in the Human Rights Domain: The Confrontation between Universalism and Relativism

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Corresponding author, Assistant Professor of Public Law, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

2 MA in Public Law, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

3 PhD Candidate of Public Law, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

Abstract

The Cultural Relativism Doctrine is a challenging concept that questions the universalist claims made in international human rights documents such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. According to this doctrine, human rights, as interpreted and conceived in the West, may not be universally acceptable for non-Western societies. Within cultural relativism, a subset called “Africanism” seeks to present its own acceptable narrative of human rights by emphasizing the principles and cultural commonalities specific to the African continent. Africanism has different views on cultural relativism, ranging from minimal to moderate and maximal perspectives. These views raise questions about the legitimacy of the global human rights paradigm. The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights also reflects this theoretical tension to a certain degree. Considering the modern African context and culture, it can be inferred that a middle-ground perspective based on intercultural cooperation and dialogue is the best way to address the challenges arising from this issue. During the post-colonial era, the traditional mechanism of safeguarding human dignity has proven ineffective and insufficient in Africa. Additionally, the interconnectedness of civil-political rights with social-economic rights appears to be a valid prioritization of various human rights types.

Introduction

This academic paper delves into the tension between cultural relativism and the universality of human rights, with a significant focus on the African perspective. The dominant human rights paradigm, rooted in Enlightenment philosophy, strongly emphasizes universality. However, cultural relativism challenges this notion, suggesting Western-centric values may be interpreted differently in non-Western societies. Africanism, a branch of cultural relativism, seeks to establish an alternative human rights narrative deeply rooted in African principles and shared cultural values. A spectrum of Africanist viewpoints on cultural relativism, ranging from minimalist to maximalist, is revealed in this debate, which finds partial reflection in the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. The paper asserts that a middle-ground approach, which places intercultural dialogue and collaboration at its core, holds the most promise for addressing the challenges posed by cultural relativism in contemporary Africa. Traditional mechanisms for upholding human dignity are considered insufficient in the post-colonial era. Moreover, the prioritization of various human rights suggests a potential convergence between civil and political rights with social and economic rights.The prevailing human rights paradigm stems from Enlightenment philosophy, particularly the ideas of Immanuel Kant. This framework emphasizes inherent and inseparable characteristics that define human rights. Belief in universal human nature, without cultural particularities, has resulted in universal human rights, implying inherent rights held by all humans, irrespective of gender, race, or culture. These rights demand respect and protection from everyone, especially governments. However, the rise of post-Enlightenment thinkers challenged the concept of a universal human subject. They proposed the "empirical subject," a human defined by their relationship with the surrounding world. One such relationship is with culture. Cultural relativism seeks to redefine the dominant human rights narrative, often perceived as "Western," to suit the needs of diverse cultures better. Proponents of cultural relativism argue against the universality of human rights, suggesting that imposing Western values can be detrimental. They advocate for respecting cultural differences in norms, values, and interactions, even if it challenges the notion of universal human rights implementation. An example of cultural relativism is the concept of "Asian values," a political ideology that emerged in the late 20th century. It emphasized the shared societal, cultural, and historical elements of Southeast and East Asian nations. Similarly, Africanism strives to counter the perceived dominance of Western values and human rights principles by drawing on the African continent's unique principles and shared cultural values. Developing culturally informed human rights narratives, despite potential risks of government exploitation, can lead to broader acceptance and application when grounded in sound philosophical, historical, and theoretical foundations. By learning from different cultures' diverse theoretical and practical experiences, we can strengthen human rights narratives like the Islamic-Iranian perspective. This paper analyzes the relationship between human rights and cultural relativism, mainly focusing on Africanist claims. It examines the impact of African perspectives on the notion of universal human rights. We will explore the discourse of cultural relativism in the context of human rights globalization and the efforts to legitimize and achieve intercultural acceptance of the universal human rights regime. The paper will also analyze key arguments and trends in African discourse on cultural relativism.

Theoretical Framework

Cultural relativism has been a focal point of substantial debate in human rights discourse for many years. Advocates of cultural relativism assert that human rights are not universal and that respecting unique cultural values and beliefs is necessary. They argue that imposing Western values on other cultures may have negative consequences and instead advocate for allowing cultures to develop their human rights norms. Conversely, opponents of cultural relativism argue that it can be employed to justify human rights violations. They support a core set of universal human rights that cross cultural boundaries. They caution that authoritarian regimes can employ cultural relativism to justify human rights abuses under the guise of cultural differences.

Methodology

This study utilizes a qualitative research methodology that critically examines the current literature on human rights, cultural relativism, and African perspectives on these topics. The key sources of information are academic journals, books, and publications from international organizations and human rights advocacy groups.

Results and Discussion

African perspectives on cultural relativism and the universality of human rights encompass a wide range of views. Minimalist Africanists recognize the importance of some universal human rights principles but advocate for cultural adaptations in their implementation. Moderate Africanists support a core set of universal human rights but argue for including specifically African cultural values. Maximalist Africanists, on the other hand, entirely reject the universality of human rights and advocate for a human rights framework based solely on African cultural values. This range of views is well-reflected in the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. The Charter incorporates several universal human rights principles while also acknowledging the significance of African cultural values and traditions. For instance, the Charter recognizes human duties.

Conclusions and Suggestions

The concept of cultural relativism presents a significant challenge to the universality of human rights. While it is important to respect cultural diversity, extreme forms of cultural relativism may lead to justifying human rights violations. The African perspective provides valuable insights into navigating this challenge.
 
 
Conclusions
Our analysis suggests that a middle-ground approach is the most appropriate way to address the challenges posed by cultural relativism in the African context. This approach emphasizes:

Intercultural dialogue and collaboration: Respectful dialogue between cultures is essential for developing universal and culturally sensitive human rights frameworks. African experiences and values can contribute significantly to this dialogue.
Reinvigorating traditional mechanisms for upholding human dignity: Traditional African mechanisms for upholding human dignity, requiring adaptation to the modern context, can provide valuable insights for strengthening human rights protections.
Prioritizing human rights: The growing emphasis on social and economic rights alongside civil and political rights reflects a more comprehensive understanding of human dignity. This convergence aligns with African cultural values that often emphasize communal well-being.

Suggestions

Developing an African human rights culture: To develop a robust African human rights culture, further research and dialogue are needed that integrates universal principles with African values and traditions.
Strengthening regional human rights institutions: Strengthening regional human rights institutions like the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights is crucial to effectively implementing and enforcing human rights in Africa. 
Capacity building: Capacity-building initiatives can equip African governments and civil society actors with the knowledge and skills necessary to uphold human rights standards.

By adopting a middle-ground approach that fosters intercultural dialogue, strengthens traditional mechanisms, and prioritizes human rights, Africa can play a crucial role in shaping a more robust and inclusive global human rights framework.

Keywords


 
 
 
Asante S.K.B. (1969). “Nation Building and Human Rights in Emerging African Nations”, Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. I, 1969, pp. II-IS.
 Boas, F. (1901): “The Mind of Primitive Man.” Science, Vol. 13, No. 321 (Feb.22,): 281-299.
Brendalyn P. (1995), “Democratization and the Protection of Human Rights in Africa: Problems and Prospects”, Praeger, Westport, Conn., pp.53-79.
 Ching, J. (1998),” Human Rights’: A Valid Chinese Concept?” In Confuciansim and Human Rights”, edited by Wm. Theodore de Bary and Tu Weiming, 67-82. 68 New York: Columbia University Press, pp 72-95.
Cobbah, J. (1987).” African Values and the Human Rights Debate: An African Perspective”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 9, No.3, 1987, pp. 321-340.
Cruft, R. (2011). “Human Rights as Rights,”, The Philosophy of Human Rights: Contemporary Controversies, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.pp. 130-152.
 Donnelly, J. (1982).” Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Analytic Critique of Non-Western Human Rights Conceptions”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 76, 1982, pp. 303-316.
Donnelly, J. (1984).” Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 6, No.4,1984, pp.400-419;
EI-Olaid, A., (1996). “HumanRights in Africa: A New Perspective on Linking the Past to the Present”, McGill Law Journal, Vol. 41, p. 810-843.
Ejidike, O. (1999) “Human Rights in the Cultural Traditions and Social Practices ofthe Igbo of SouthEastern Nigeria”, Journal ofAfrican Law, Vol.43, No.1 1999, pp.83-99.
Femyhough, T. (1993). “Human Rights and Pre-Colonial Africa”, in: Goran Hyden and Winston P. Nagan (cds.), Human Rights and Governance in Africa, University Press of Florida, Gainsville, 1993, pp. 39-73.
 Good, C. (2010): "Human rights and relativism." Macalester Journal of Philosophy 19.1 pp.21-56.
Haile, M. (1984) “Human Rights, Stability and Development in Africa: Some Observations on Concept and Reality”, Virginia Journal ofInternational Law, Vol. 204, No.3, 1984, p. 575.
Howard, R. (1983) “The Full Belly Thesis: Should Economic Rights take Priority over Civil and Political Rights? Evidence from sub–Saharan Africa”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 5, No.4, 1983, pp. 442-467.
Howard, R. (1986).” Human Rights in Commonwealth Africa”, Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa, N. J, 1986, p. 19
Howard, R. (1991).” Rights Law and Practice, Lagos”, Vol. I, Nos. 3: 2, I and2, 1991, pp. 7-20.
Ibhawoh, B, (2001) "Cultural Relativism and Human Rights: Reconsidering the Africanist Discourse." Netherlands quarterly of human rights 19.1: 40-62
Ibhawoh, B. (2000) “Between Culture and Constitution: Evaluating the Cultural Legitimacy of Human Rights in the African State', Human Rights Quarterly”, Vol. 22, No.3, pp. 838-860.
Ishay, M R. (2004) “The History of Human Rights: from Ancient Times to the Globalization Era”. Berkeley, Ca: University of California Press, 10-31
Kannyo, E. (1980) “Human Rights in Africa: Problems and Prospects”, A Report Prepared for the International League for Human Rights, pp. 1-24.
Keba, M. (1987),” Organization de L'Unite Africaine', in: Les Dimensions Internationales des Droits de l'Homme”, UNESCO, Paris, 1987, pp. 651-679.
kent, A.; Avonius, L; Kingsbury, D (eds.), (2008) “Chinese Values and Human Rights, Human Rights in Asia: A Reassessment of the Asian Values Debate”, New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 83–97,
Lenzerini, F. (2014). “The Debate on ‘Universalism’ and ‘Cultural Relativism’ in International Human Rights Law”, The Culturalization of Human Rights Law (Oxford, 2014; online edn, Oxford Academic, 16 Apr.2014).
Lindholt, L. (1997), “Questioning the Universality of Human Rights: TheAfrican Charter on Human and People's Rights in Botswana”, Malawi and Mozambique, Aldershot, Brookfield, Dartmouth, 1997, pp. 20-36.
 Makau W. (1995), “The Banjul Charter and the African Cultural Fingerprint: An Evaluation ofthe Language of Rights and Duties”, Virginia Journal ofInternational Law, Vol. 35, No.2, 1995, pp. 341-432.
Makau W. (1999). “Limitations on Religious Rights: Problematizing Religious Freedom in the African Context”. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 5, 1999, pp.75-105
Makau, W. (1995), “The Banjul Charter and the African Cultural Fingerprint: An Evaluation of the Language of Rights and Duties”, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 35, No.2, 1995, pp. 358-374.
Mamdani, M. (1990) “The Social Basis of Constitutionalism in Africa”, The Journal ofModern African Studies, Vol. 28, No.3, 1990, pp. 355-370.
Mosafa, N., & Zargari, H. (2014). “International Instrument of Human Rights: Compliance and Non-Fulfillment in Africa”. World Politics, 3(2), 100-127. [In Persian]
 Nickel, J. (1987),” Making Sense ofHuman Rights: Philisophical Reflections on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, University of Calfornia Press, Berkeley, 1987, pp. 44-63.
Osita, C. (1992) “Is the Protection of Human Rights and Democracy strange to African Traditions?”, in: Abayorni, pp. 71-97.
Panikkar, R. (1982) "Is the notion of human rights a Western concept?" Diogenes 30, no. 120 (1982): 75-102.
Prakash Sinha, S. (1981). Human Rights: A Non-Western View Point, Archivfur Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie, Vol.67,1981, pp. 67-98.
Qari Seyyed Fatemi, S.M. (2020), “Human rights in contemprory era Book 1”, Negahe moaaser Publishing2020. [In Persian]
Quashigah, K. (1991)” The Philosophical Basis ofHurnan Rights and its Relation to Africa”, Journal of Human Rights Law and Practice, Lagos, Vol. I, Nos. 3: 2, I and 2, 1991, pp. 7-20.
Rehof, L. and Trier, T. (1990) “Menneskeret, Jurist-og 0konomforbundts Forlag”, Kebenhvn,1990, pp.52.72.
Rose, M. (1985). “Human and Peoples′ Rights: Distinctive Features of the African Charte” r. Journal of African Law, 29, pp 72-81.
Shivji, I (1989).” The Concept ofHuman Rights in Africa”, Codesria, London, p. 10-32.
soltanghes, F., Zaheri, A., & ghasemi, M. (2021). Motives for concluding international treaties in the light of international political economy. International Relations Researches, 11(1), 161-188. doi: 10.22034/irr.2021.130966 [In Persian]
 Statement on Human Rights by the Executive Board, (1947), American Anthropological Association, American Anthropologist, Vol. 49, 1947, pp.539- 543.
 Taylor, Ch. (1996) “A World Consensus on Human Rights?” Dissent (Summer,1996): 15-21.
Tevoedjre, A. (1986) “Human Rights and Democracy in Africa, Annual Lecture Series”, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp. 8-22.
Walker N. (2013), “Universalism and particularism in human rights”. In: Holder C, Reidy D, eds. Human Rights: The Hard Questions. Cambridge University Press; 2013:39-58.
Welch, C. and Meltzer, R. (1984), “HumanRights and Development in Africa”, State UniversityOf New York Press, Albany, pp.12-20.
Xiaorong L, (1996) “Asian Values" and the Universality of Human Rights”, Philosophy and Public Policy, Vol. 16, No.2,1996, pp, 18-22.
Zamani, S. G., & Ghasemi, M. (2022). Explanation the Role of the World Trade Organisation Dispute Settlement Body in the Development of International Law. International Relations Researches, 12(2), 183-211. doi: 10.22034/irr.2022.334439.2162 [In Persian]