Russia and Afghanistan after the rise of the Taliban

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student in International Relations, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Research Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Qom Branch, Qom Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran (corresponding author)

Abstract

The sudden withdrawal of Western forces from Afghanistan and the reappearance of theTaliban in this country led to the creation of a new scene in the field of Afghan politics and the change of the position of internal and external actors involved in thiscountry;These developments andevents in Afghanistanbecame aserious challenge for Russia.The sudden withdrawal of the remainingWestern forces from Afghanistan and the seizure of power by the Taliban led to a decrease in fighting violence across the country,but greatly increased the overall level of uncertainty.Therefore, Russia tried toreact to thiscrisis byconsidering regional and international goals.This article is created with the aim of identifying the reasons for revision in the foreign policy of Russia regarding the developments in Afghanistan due to the re-emergence of theTaliban.Therefore, the main question is raised, what are the reasons for revising Russia's foreign policy regarding the developments in Afghanistan due to the emergence of theTaliban in this country?To find the answer to this question, the descriptive-analytical research method has been used,using library collection tools and internet sites.Also,the authors will examine this hypothesis,Afghanistan isof great importancein thestrategicposition of Russia,andstable instabilityin Afghanistan after the withdrawal of American forces can create a security threat forRussia and otherCIS members.The findings of the article show that Russia has dealt with Afghanistan by adopting a tactical approach with the aim of managing and repelling threatsin itsforeign policy.NowRussia is trying toenter the peace processinAfghanistan with its aggressive approach as a world power and in this way it can impose its policy on Afghanistan.

Introduction

Afghanistan has always played an important role in Russia's foreign policy and national security doctrines. Although Afghanistan is not considered one of Russia's neighbors and does not have a border with Russia, but according to the Russians, it is a country that, on the one hand, is a source of terrorism, extremism, and drug exports, and on the other hand, borders with areas close to Russia is considered as Central Asia. Therefore, Kremlin officials have mainly sought to reduce and weaken the threatening waves of Afghanistan. In other words, Russia's view of Afghanistan is defined by its view of Central Asia, which has considered this region as its backyard for decades and is sensitive to any destructive actions and the spread of insecurity and instability to this region, which was once a part of Russia. With the withdrawal of the United States from Afghanistan, it provoked various reactions from Moscow, which has a long-term security experience in this country. Russia was able to make the most visible immediate response by adopting a strategic anti-US strategy. Therefore, by participating in multinational diplomatic dialogues and at the same time taking the opportunity to call for increased Eurasian strategic coordination through non-Western venues such as the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). ) and the triangle of Russia, India and China (RIC) to ensure its interests and security. Russia's strategy is to maintain as much stability as possible in Afghanistan while promoting its official position as a security provider in Central Asia. In this regard, the Kremlin will take advantage of its initial interaction with the Taliban and create a pragmatic approach for the Taliban government and quickly adapt to the new realities in Afghanistan with policies that are pragmatic and pursue its main interests, security in Afghanistan and strengthening regional influence. itself, especially in Tajikistan, it is clear that it adapts. Russia's adaptation to Afghanistan's new political order reflects the impact of more than a decade of covert and public diplomacy with the Taliban.
2.Theoretical Framework
According to the theorists of aggressive realism, the goal of all revisionist governments is to reach a hegemonic position in the international system.Therefore, this group of governments is strongly seeking to gain power and if the conditions are right, they want to change the distribution of power in their favor.Therefore, the great powers are interested in hegemony in their region and at the same time, they prevent the alignment and hegemony of other great powers in their respective regions.Of course, this does not mean that governments are unquestioningly subject to the process of international developments, but rather their aggressive behavior in foreign policy and their actions are based on backgrounding capabilities on the functioning of other units and even changes in power equations.It is effective.If the weaker states in the international system find an opportunity to change the balance of power in their favor, they will never miss it. According to the theory of realism, countries that face real and permanent threats have a revisionist nature and behave aggressively.Therefore, the main goal and motivation of countries is to maximize power and security. They try to maximize their influence and relative power.In the conditions of time and place where the benefits of power maximization are more than its cost, countries do it at the cost of reducing the security of others.Due to the ambition of hegemony, Afghanistan has been managed in the last several decades with an extrapolated order resulting from the intervention of great powers.The non-compliance of this order with the realities of the region has been one of the important factors of instability and an important obstacle to establishing a stable domestic order.interfere and not allow other regional powers to enter. Therefore, when a great power uses force or the threat of force against anyone, it must consider strategies to maintain its power and continue it until a decisive victory is achieved.

Methodology

 In this study, descriptive-analytical method and within the framework of offensive realism to express the variables of the research, "Taliban gaining power in Afghanistan" as an independent variable and "expanding cooperation between Russia and the Taliban with the aim of filling the void of American presence in Afghanistan" and "controlling religious extremism in Central Asia" is assumed as the dependent variable.

Results & Discussion

Russia sees various threats from Afghanistan, the most important of which is considered to be against the interests and security of the Russian Federation. Russia always feels threatened by the Islamic State in Afghanistan, and with the expansion of ISIS in Moscow, it expresses concern about the spread of this group to the northern regions of Afghanistan, Central Asia, and Russia. The issue of drugs is another threat to Russia. river Afghanistan is a supplier of drugs to the world, most of which are produced in areas controlled by the Taliban. Most of these drugs are smuggled to Russia and every year a large number of Russian people die from its use. Russia has also had a realistic view on the issue of Afghanistan, and Afghanistan is and expresses increasing concern about the prospects of stability in this country after the withdrawal of American forces. The findings of the article show that Russia has dealt with Afghanistan by adopting a tactical approach with the aim of managing and repelling threats in its foreign policy. Now Russia is trying to enter the peace process in Afghanistan with its aggressive approach as a world power and in this way it can impose its policy on Afghanistan. Considering that the Afghan government cannot accept this approach and from Afghanistan's point of view, Moscow should adopt the approach of the Afghan government and people based on the will of the people and Afghanistan in the peace process. In this regard, Russia is trying to maintain its geopolitical goals by maintaining its security approach and at the same time expand its influence in the region with its efforts and policy design, and by doing this, it can form a more diverse approach at the national level. so that in this way he can consolidate his sovereignty and maintain his international position.

Conclusions & Suggestions

In fact, Russia's policy in Afghanistan is walking on a tightrope with the reactivation of the Taliban, because Moscow's scope of action is limited. It prefers the Taliban to consolidate power, because it considers this group as a potential guarantor of stability in Afghanistan. This can be understood from the movements and rhetoric of Russian diplomacy regarding the Taliban and other third parties. However, at the same time, Moscow cannot become a direct supporter of the Taliban. There are important caveats regarding recognizing this group as the Afghan government or directly supporting this group. Doing so runs counter to Moscow's reputation as a fighter against international terrorism and risks alienating some of its Central Asian allies. However, Russia's agenda in Afghanistan differs from that of the Taliban, meaning that engagement with the Taliban is preferable but not necessary to achieve its goals in the country. In fact, Moscow is not interested in this group itself, but in the Taliban for the security guarantees they can provide.

Keywords


Allison, R. (2004). Strategic Reassertion in Russia’s Central Asia Policy;International Affairs80.p277–293).
Allison, R.  (2021). Executive Summary, Russian Interests in Afghanistan; SCEEUS Report No. 1.
Halbach, U. 2013. Afghanistan Shadows over CentralAsia. Security and Human Rights;2014:,p137–148.
Hojatzadeh, Hossamuddin, (2018), Russia's changing strategies in Afghanistan and its future, Abrar Contemporary International Studies and Research Institute, Tehran, Khordad,,p 1-4. [In Persian].
Hosseinpour, Mohammad Baqir, (2022), Russia's policy in the context of Afghanistan's developments, Iras, 21 Mehr.p 1-2. [In Persian]
Janse,Diana. (2021). Russian Interests in Afghanistan, SCEEUS REPORT No1.p1-12.
Jokar, A. (2021). Russia’s Multipronged Policy in Afghanistan, January, Top Expert at Central Asia and Caucasus Studies, January.p1-5.
Kazantsev, Andrei and Medvedeva, Svetlana. (2016). Russia’s good cop, bad cop strategy in Afghanistan,Russia is concerned with a worsening security situation in Afghanistan. To avert further escalation, it is ready to use diverse means of aversion, January.p1-5.
Khoshaind, Hamid. (2022). Russia's strategy towards Afghanistan. Foreign Relations Strategic Council. September 1. [In Persian]
Karmi, Jahangir. and Jahanbakhsh, Mohammad Taqi. (2014). The position of Afghanistan in the security policy of the Russian Federation. World politics, scientific research quarterly of world politics. Fourth term, number two, summer.p33-65. [In Persian]
Khaleghi Nejad, Maryam. (2021). Factors affecting the Taliban's recent rise in power. International Peace Studies Center (IPSC) available at: https://peace-ipsc.org/fa,p1-4. [In Persian]
 Kapoor.Nivedita .(2021). From War to Peace: The Regional Stakes in Afghanistan’s Future, Attribution:, “From War to Peace: The Regional Stakes in Afghanistan’s Future,” ORF Special Report No. 131, March 2021, Observer Research Foundation.p1-24.
Khadim Shirazi, Fatemeh, (2022), Variables affecting Russia's foreign policy in Afghanistan, International Center for Peace Studies, July31.p 1-6. [In Persian]
Kulai, (Tabarstani), goddess. (2011). Politics and government in Central Eurasia. First Edition. Tehran: Samit Publications. P1- 479. [In Persian]
Lewis, David G. (2020). Return to Kabul? Russian Policy in Afghanistan; ISSN 1867-4119 No. 60; June.p1-11.
Lang, J. (2014). Afghanistan: the view from Russia; European Union Institute for Security Studies
Mearsheimer, john, J. (2006).Conversationin International Relations, (part1), International Relations, Vol 20.p105-123.
Mearsheimer's, J. (2014). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics;Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October.p1-555.
Najam, Abbas. (2021). Russia & Post-US Withdrawal Afghanistan, Geopolitics & Diplomacy, September 24.
Pawar, M. (2011). Russia’s Afghan Strategy: What are its Interests? on Afghanistan’s geo-strategic, geopolitical and geo-economic significance; 28 Dec, 2011. P1-4.  
Ramani, S. (2021). Russia and the Taliban: Prospective Partners? 14 September.p1-3.
Stepanova, Ekaterina. (2021). Russia’s Approach to Afghanistan Following the Taliban Takeover; Policy Memos | Аналитика; November 22 .p1-6.
Smith, J. (2016). Russia - Taliban relations; Afghan – American concern; Our Afghanistan newspaper, December 3.
Shafiei, Ismail and Eiduzai, Naeem. (2014). The role of foreign support in the revival of the Taliban in Afghanistan. Subcontinental Studies Quarterly of the University of Sistan and Baluchistan. 5th year, 16th issue, autumn.p91-126. [In Persian]
Selahshor, Khalil. (2016). Russia and Iran's relations with the Taliban in Afghanistan. Anatolia News Agency. Available at: https://www.aa.com.t r/fa%D 8% AF%D8%B1-6/717271.p1-4. [In Persian]
Sajjadpour, Seyyed Mohammad Kazem. and Jahanbakhsh, Mottaqi. (2018). Examining the link between code and genome in the foreign policy of Russia and Afghanistan. Central Asia and Caucasus Quarterly. No. 99, Autumn,p 27-49. [In Persian]
Shweta, D. (2022). Reimagining Afghanistan: Geostrategic Engagement with Major Powers, Published, Shweta Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs, Air University Press, Jan. 27.p1-7
Taneja, K. (2021). Ed, “From War to Peace: The Regional Stakes in Afghanistan’s Future,” ORF Special Report No. 131, March, Observer Research Foundation.p1-24.
Taieb, R & Rizwan, A & Jami, M. (2021). Reluctant Reentrance? Russia and Afghanistan post.p1-6.
Valeriano, Brandon. (2009).The Tragedy of Offensive Realism:Testing Aggressive Power Politics Models; Article in International Interactions April 2009DOI: 10.1080/03 0506209 02864493.p179-206.
Weitz, R. (2010). "Russia's Dangerous Fix, Foreign Policy ", June 21, Availableathttp: //afpak.foreignpolicy.com/posts /2010/06/21 /russias_dangerous_fix