ایران و شبه جزیره کره: تداوم پراگماتیسم کلاسیک در سیاست خارجی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه علوم سیاسی/دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

بطور کلی، رهیافت ایران در قبال شبه جزیره کره رفتار نسبتا غیرمتعارفی در مقایسه با الگوی کلی سیاست‌سازی خارجی آن بوده است. چه در دوره پهلوی و چه در زمان جمهوری اسلامی، ایران دارای جهت‌گیری نسبتا کمرنگ ولی اغلب فعالی در قبال هم کره جنوبی و هم کره شمالی بوده است تا بتواند در آن منطقه خاص جغرافیایی تا حد ممکن به تمام اهداف مدنظر خود در حوزه‌های سیاسی، نظامی، اقتصادی، مالی، فناورانه، و فرهنگی برسد. پژوهش حاضر ضمن تمرکز بر چارچوب تحلیلی پراگماتیسم، استدلال می‌کند که در چندین دهه گذشته سیاست ایران نسبت به هر دو کره از نوعی پیوستگی و کارآمدی نسبی برخوردار بوده است، چرا که هدف اصلی تهران آن بوده است تا اهداف متعدد خود در شبه جزیره را بی‌سروصدا و تا حدودی با پرداخت هزینه‌ای کم تامین نماید. مهم‌تر آنکه، سیاست ایران در قبال شبه جزیره کره، بویژه در دوره جمهوری اسلامی، و درس‌هایی که دیپلماسی کشور از تعاملات نسبتا چندبعدی خود با هر دو کره بدست آورد، می‌توانست بعنوان الگوی الهام‌بخشی برای سیاست‌سازی خارجی نسبت به برخی دیگر از مناطق مهم دنیا که دارای منافع حیاتی زیادی برای ایران هستند مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Iran and the Korean Peninsula: Continuation of Classical Pragmatism in Foreign Policy

چکیده [English]

The Iranian policy behavior toward the Korean Peninsula has generally remained as an anomaly to its overall pattern of foreign policymaking with regard to many other parts of the world. Both under the Pahlavi monarchy and the Islamic Republic, Iran has often kept a rather low-profile yet active approach vis-à-vis the Koreans on both sides of the peninsula, aiming to accomplish a great deal of its objectives in all political, military, economic, financial, technological, and cultural areas. Applying a pragmatist framework of analysis, this study argues that within the past several decades the Iranian orientation has been somehow persistent and effective, making it possible for Tehran to quietly pursue its various goals in the peninsula at a relatively low cost. More importantly, Iran’s approach toward the Korean Peninsula under the Islamic Republic and the lessons Tehran gleaned from its multifaceted interactions with South Korea and North Korea over a course of more than four decades could be used as an illuminating template for foreign policymaking toward some other important regions where Iran has enormous interests.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Iran
  • South Korea
  • North Korea
  • pragmatism
  • foreign policy
Cronin, P.M. (Ed.). (2008), Double Trouble: Iran and North Korea as Challenges to International Security. Westport and London: Praeger Security International.
Davidson, C.M. (2010), The Persian Gulf and Pacific Asia: From Indifference to Interdependence. New York: Columbia University Press.
Erlich, R. (2019), The Iran Agenda Today: The Real Story Inside Iran and What's Wrong with U.S. Policy. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
ROK’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (1996), Wegyo munseo [Diplomatic Archives]. Seoul: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Wilber, D.N. (1976), Iran: Past and Present, Eighth Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Buss, C.A. (1982), The United States and the Republic of Korea: Background for Policy. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
Taylor, W. J. (Ed.). (1989), The Future of South Korean–U.S. Security Relations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
IBP USA. (2011), North Korea: Energy Policy, Laws and Regulations Handbook, Volume 1: Strategic Information and Development. Washington, D.C.: International Business Publications.
ROK’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2003), Wegyo munseo [Diplomatic Archives]. Seoul: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Metzler, J.J. (2001), Divided Dynamism – The Diplomacy of Separate Nations: Germany, Korea, China. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Dennis, A.J. (2001), The Rise of the Islamic Empire and the Threat to the West, Second Edition. Lima, OH: Wyndham Hall Press.
Reese, D. (1998), The Prospects for North Korea’s Survival, Adelphi Paper 323. New York: Oxford University Press for the International Institute for Strategic Studies.
Economist Intelligence Unit. (1997), Country Profile: South Korea, North Korea, 1997–98. London: Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU).
Brown, G.T. (1973), Korean Pricing Policies and Economic Development in the 1960s. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dent, C.M. (2002), The Foreign Economic Policies of Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Disney, N. (1977), “South Korean Workers in the Middle East,” MERIP Reports 61: 22–24, 26.
Duncan, J.B. (2014), The Origins of the Choson Dynasty. Seattle, WA: The University of Washington Press.
Fenollosa, E.F. (2007), Epochs of Chinese and Japanese Art: An Outline History of East Asiatic Design. Berkeley, CA: Stone Bridge Press.
Field, G. (1995), Economic Growth and Political Change in Asia. London: Macmillan Press.
Garver, J.W. (2006), China and Iran: Ancient Partners in a Post-Imperial World. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Hanieh, A. (2011), Capitalism and Class in the Gulf Arab States. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hapdong News Agency. (1987), Korea Annual 1987. Seoul: Hapdong News Agency.
Kazemzadeh, M. (2020), Iran’s Foreign Policy: Elite Factionalism, Ideology, the Nuclear Weapons Program, and the United States. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Kim, B. (2017), Unveiling the North Korean Economy: Collapse and Transition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kim, S. (2018), K-pop Live: Fans, Idols, and Multimedia Performance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Korea Muslim Federation. (1996), Special Issue on the 40th Anniversary of Islam in Korea (19551995), Seoul: Korea Muslim Federation.
Korean Culture and Information Service, (2011), The Korean Wave: A New Pop Culture Phenomenon. Seoul: Korean Culture and Information Service.
Lane, G. (2003), Early Mongol Rule in Thirteenth-Century Iran: A Persian Renaissance. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
Metraux, D. (1992), “The Economy.” In South Korea: A Country Study, Fourth Edition, edited by A. Matles Savada and W. Shaw, 135–196. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, Federal Research Division.
MobileReference. (2010), Travel Seoul, South Korea: Illustrated Guide, Korean Phrasebook and Maps (Mobi Travel) [E-book]. Boston: MobileReference.
Osiewicz, P. (2020), Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Between Ideology and Pragmatism. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Panda, A. (2020), Kim Jong Un and the Bomb: Survival and Deterrence in North Korea. New York: Oxford University Press.
Robinson, D.M. (2009), Empire’s Twilight: Northeast Asia under the Mongols. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Asia Center.
Snyder, S. (2018), South Korea at the Crossroads: Autonomy and Alliance in an Era of Rival Powers. New York: Columbia University Press.
The Financial Times. (1983), Financial Times Oil and Gas International Year Book. London: Longman.
The World Bank. (1993), The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy – A World Bank Policy Research Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yager, J.A. (1984), The Energy Balance in Northeast Asia. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.