نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، گروه حقوق، واحد اردبیل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اردبیل، ایران
2 استادیارفقه و حقوق اسلامی، گروه الهیات و فقه و مبانی حقوق، واحد اردبیل، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اردبیل، ایران
3 استادیار حقوق تجارت بین الملل، گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Today, in the world of trade and diplomacy, before concluding any agreement and contract, the parties negotiate directly and indirectly. Negotiation, such as mediation, and other alternative solutions, such as Jamila's efforts, provide the necessary facilities for an Sufficient agreement and a binding contract. Of course, negotiation or mediation may not lead to an agreement. Because the parties are not required to conclude a contract based on the principle of freedom of contracts. In this case, what executive guarantee is there regarding the disclosure of commercial or political secrets of one of the parties due to termination of negotiations? This article is done with a comparative approach and a descriptive, analytical and library research method. It also deals with the descriptive analysis of negotiation and its difference with mediation, the rights regarding the termination of negotiations and also the guarantee of the implementation of the protection of trade secrets of the parties in the provisions of the principles of European contract law and Iranian law. In addition, the negotiation process that leads to adequate agreement and contract will be discussed. . If the termination of the negotiation is in such a way that the other party's commercial and political information is disclosed, he acted against good faith and according to the general rules of civil liability, he will be required to compensate for the damage. It seems that all the cases mentioned in the principles of European contract law are considered cases and examples of fault.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)