تبیین جایگاه ایران در مقایسه با نفوذ گسترده بازیگران جهانی در منطقه راهبردی قفقاز جنوبی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مدرس دانشگاه، دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، مدیریت صنعتی (تولید)، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

2 دکتری، رشته مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قزوین، قزوین، ایران.

3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رشت

4 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی‌ارشد مدیریت کسب‌وکار (فناوری اطلاعات)، دانشگاه پیام نور کرج، رشت، ایران

چکیده

منطقه قفقاز جنوبی، فارغ از چالشهای سیاسی- امنیتی؛ بعنوان دریچه‌ای برای تعاملات فرهنگی، اقتصادی-تجاری و جغرافیای سیاسی به شمار می آید و بسیاری از کارشناسان بر اهمیت ژئوپلوتیک، ژئواکونومیک و ژئواستراتژیک این منطقه صحه گذاشته و بر این موضوع که جهت بهره برداری از مزیتهای این منطقه باید حوزه نفوذ خود را از جهات گوناگون افزایش دهند، تأکید کرده اند. در این راستا، هدف مقاله بررسی و تبیین جایگاه ایران در مقایسه با نفوذ گسترده بازیگران جهانی و ماهیت نقش آفرینی هریک از آنها در منطقه راهبردی قفقاز جنوبی در نظر گرفته شد. برای این منظور، با بهره گیری از مطالعات اسنادی و کتابخانه ای، ابتدا از بین بازیگران منطقه ای و فرامنطقه ای 12 کشور، نهاد، سازمان یا اتحادیه شناسایی و طبق گزارش ها و پژوهشهای مختلف نقشها و اقداماتی که هر یک بازیگران در این منطقه ایفا می کنند، تشریح و ماهیت آنها تبیین گردید. یافته ها نشان داد که 12 نقش فرعی و اقدام شناسایی شده از سوی بازیگران منطقه ای و فرامنطقه ای در 3 دسته کلی اقتصاد-تجاری؛ نظامی-راهبردی-امنیتی-اطلاعاتی؛ و ژئوپلوتیک قرار می گیرد. از طرفی تحلیل تبادلات تجاری کشورهای منطقه قفقاز جنوبی نشان داد که جایگاه ایران بعنوان یک کشور منطقه ای که با 2 کشور اصلی قفقاز جنوبی یعنی «ارمنستان» و «جمهوری آذربایجان» مرز مشترک دارد نسبت به روسیه و ترکیه بعنوان بازیگران منطقه ای؛ و آمریکا، چین، کشورهای اروپایی و رژیم اشغالگر قدس بعنوان بازیگران فرامنطقه ای که عمدتاً عضو جی20 هستند، کمرنگ تر شده و نیازمند تقویت جایگاه خود در منطقه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the Position of Iran in Comparison with the Extensive Influence of Global Actors in the Strategic South Caucasus Region

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehran Mehdizade 1
  • Abdul Hossein Peikarnegar 2
  • Mohammad Taleghani 3
  • Ebrahim Alizadeh 4
1 Lecturar at University, MA. Industrial Management, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2 PhD, Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Department of Industrial Management, Islamic Azad University (Rasht Branch), Rasht, Guilan, Iran
4 MA. MBA- Business Management, Payam Noor University, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

Regardless of political-security issues, the South Caucasus, serves as a gateway for cultural, economic-trade, and political geography connections. Many analysts confirm to the region’s geopolitical, geoeconomic, and geostrategic significance, emphasizing that in order to reap the benefits of the region, countries must broaden their influence in many areas. This study attempted to clarify Iran’s significance in light of the wide-ranging effect of world actors and explore the nature of each actor’s role-playing in the South Caucasus strategic region. To this end, by using documentary and library research methods, 12 countries, entities, organizations, or unions among regional and extra-regional actors were identified, and the roles and actions that each of the actors play in the region were explained in accordance with numerous publications and studies. According to the findings, the 12 identified secondary and extra-regional actors’ actions are divided into three primary categories: economic-trade, military, strategic, security, and intelligence, and geopolitics. Furthermore, an analysis of South Caucasus business transactions revealed that Iran’s position as one of the regional countries with common borders with two major South Caucasus countries, namely the Republic of Azerbaijan and Armenia, has weakened and requires reinforcement in the region when compared to Russia and Turkey as regional actors, the US, China, European countries, and Israel as extra-regional actors that are mostly G20 members.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Global Actors
  • South Caucasus
  • Geoeconomics
  • Geopolitics
  • Geostrategics
Ajili, H and Zare, M (2016). The Impact of Turkmenistan's Foreign Policy on Its Economy, ‍Central Asia and The Caucasus Journal, Volume21, Issue92. Pages 1-27.[In Persian]
Asaadi, B and Monavari, S. A (2021). Review of Iran-Russia Relations in the New Century: Strategic Alliance or Convergence of Interests, Political and International Approaches, Volume12, Issue4. Pages 181-210.[In Persian]
Aydintasbas, A and Giragosian, R (2022). Acts of normality: The potential for Turkey-Armenia rapprochement, The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), Volume439, Issue1, Pages 1-23.
FalahatPishe, H and Sharbati, V; Mozafari, M. M (2015). Turkey’s Foreign Policy in South Caucasus and Interests of Iran and Russia, Political Strategic Studies, Volume4, Issue12. Pages 37-60.[In Persian]
Fallahi, E and Shafiee, N (2020). Assessment of China’s Strategy in South Caucasus. Central Eurasia Studies, Volume 13, Issue 2. Pages 515-542. [In Persian]
Goble, P (2022). As War Rages in Ukraine, Turkey Expanding Its Soft Power in North Caucasus, Eurasia Daily Monitor, Volume19, Issue86. Pages 1-4.
Golmohammadi, V and Azizi, H (2022). The South Caucasus in the Regionalism of Iran's Foreign Policy, Central Eurasia Studies, Volume15, Issue1. Pages 281-305.[In Persian]
Hakim, H and Jafari Valdani, A (2015). Geopolitics Changes of Caucasus and its Effects on National Security of Islamic Republic of Iran, Journal of Central Asia and The Caucasus Studies, Volume21, Issue91. Pages 38-64.[In Persian]
Hildreth, S. A and Carl, E. K (2011). Missile Defence and Nato’s Lisbon Summit, Congressional Research Service, Volume7-5700, IssueR41549. Pages 1-11.
Hosinzadeh, S and Asgarkhani, A; Mir Abbasi, S. M. B (2019). Russian and Turkish approaches to security arrangements in the South Caucasus, Political Sociology of Iran, Volume1, Issue4. Pages 209-237.[In Persian]
Iran Chamber Research Center (2022). Regional corridors and geoeconomic position of Iran, Tehran: Iran Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture (ICCIMA)- Educational and Research Institude. Pages 1-36.[In Persian]
Iran-Russia Friendship Associations (2018). The economy of the Eurasian Economic Union. IR: Tehran: IRRRUFA.
Jafari Valdani, A and Safavi Homami, S. Y; Hakim, H (2015). The geopolitical changes of the Caucasus and the effect of the constant geopolitical factors resulting from it on the national security of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Scientific Journal of Security Horizons, Volume8, Issue28. Pages 135-160.[In Persian]
Jafarzadeh, A, Shakeri, A and Momeni, F; Abdoli, G (2014). Cooperation among natural gas exporting of Caspian sea countries to export gas to Europe with respect to environmental requirements in a game theoretic framework, Economics Research, Volume14, Issue55. Pages 1-40.[In Persian]
Javadi Arjomand, M. J and Fallahi, E (2015). The Comparative Examination of Iran and Turkey’s Foreign Policy in South Caucasus with Emphasis on Azerbaijan and Armenia, Central Eurasia Studies, Volume 8, Issue 2. Pages 211-228. [In Persian]
Kakaei, S and Dehghani Firouzabadi, S. J (2021). Turkey’s Policy in the Karabakh Dispute, ‍Central Asia and The Caucasus Journal, Volume27, Issue115. Pages 97-122.[In Persian]
Malakoutian, M. (2007). The "Color Revolutions" in Central Asia and CAUCASUS and their defferences with actual revolutions, Political Quarterly, Volume37, Issue4. Pages 239-257.[In Persian]
Masoudnia, H and Najafi, D (2012). The Turkey's new foreign policy and security threats in the face of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Scientific Journal of Security Horizons, Volume4, Issue13. Pages 137-162.[In Persian]
Nichol, J (2014). Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: Political Developments and Implications for U.S. Interests, Congressional Research Service, Volume7-5700, IssueR33453. Pages 1-36.
Ogutcu, M (2015). China in the South Caucasus: not a critical partnership but still needed. In the South Caucasus Between integration and fragmentation. EPC & SAM, European Policy Center.
Omidi, A and Falahi, E; Barkhordari Naghani, T (2019). Comparative Analysis of USA and Russia's Soft Power in the South Caucasus, World Politics, Volume8, Issue1. Pages 229-259.[In Persian]
Omidi, A and Kheyri, M (2016). The Azerbaijan and Zionist Regime relationship and its Implications on National Security of Iran, Strategic Studies Quarterly, Volume19, Issue73. Pages 137-158.[In Persian]
Oskanian, K (2011). Turkey's global strategy: Turkey and the Caucasus. IDEAS reports- special reports, Kitchen, Nicholas. UK: London School of Economics and Political Science.
Rahnejat, M and Kabiri, H (2018). Factors Affecting the Divergence of Relations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Georgia (2000-2016). World Politics, Volume7, Issue1. Pages 139-166.[In Persian]
Rashidi, A and Maleki, M. (2019). Russia's Interests and Crisis in the South Caucasus, Journal of Politics and International Relations, Volume3, Issue5. Pages 167-193.[In Persian]
Shafiei, A and Postinchi, Z and Ghorbani Sheikhneshin, A; Khodaverdi, H (2020). Study of political-security relations between the Republic of Azerbaijan and Israel and its impact on the national security of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Political Sociology of Iran, Volume3, Issue3. Pages 1179-1194.[In Persian]
Skiertandrzejuk, K (2018). The New Edition of the New Silk Road – the South Caucasus Case, Polish Journal of Political Science, Volume 4, Issue 2. Pages 79-94.
Taheri, E. (2021). Network building strategy and position of I.R.I in foreign policy of India in Eurasia, Political International Researches, Volume13, Issue49. Pages 21-37.[In Persian]
The Observatory of Economic Complexity (2020). Visualize, understand, and interact with the latest international trade data. (oec.world)
Valizadeh, A and Sadeghi, M (2021). The Convention on the Legal Regime of the Caspian Sea and Iran’s Position in the South Caucasus Energy Geopolitics, Central Eurasia Studies, Volume14, Issue1. Pages 153-176.[In Persian]
Zahrani, M and Faraji Lohesara, T (2013). The International Sources of Karabakh Conflict Continuation. ‍Central Asia and The Caucasus Journal, Volume19, Issue83. Pages 108-134. [In Persian]