واکاوی ظرفیت‌ زمینه‌ایِ اقتصادی و سیاسی ایران در مشارکت جامع راهبردی با چین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری روابط بین الملل، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

2 نویسنده مسئول، استاد روابط بین الملل، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

روابط ایران و چین طی تاریخ دارای فراز و فرودهایی بوده که هیچ ‌گاه در دشمنی کامل به سر نبرده‌اند. روابط دو کشور در یک دهه قبل، وارد شکل جدیدی شده که منجر به «مشارکت جامع راهبردی» بین آنها شده است، با مطرح شدن مشارکت جامع راهبردی و عقد قرارداد 25 ساله بین دو کشور، همگرایی سیاسی و اقتصادی نسبتا رو به بهبودی شکل گرفته است. مشارکت جامع راهبردی از طریق تحریم‌های غربی و رویگردانی ایران از غرب و رویکرد نگاه به شرق تهران، تشدید انسداد فروش نفت و کاهش تبادلات تجاری توسط تحریم‌ ها، نیاز چین به مشارکت‌‌ با ایران به منظور تکمیل طرح کمربند - راه و تامین انرژی و توسعه صادرات، رویکرد کانترهژمون ایران و چین و اشتراک ذهنی و تاریخی رهبران از استعمار، همگرایی اقتصادی و سیاسی بین ایران و چین را رقم زده ‌است که بررسی و واکاوی یا علت این همگرایی‌ها و ظرفیت‌ها هدف این مقاله است. روش تحقیق در این مقاله توصیفی - تببینی می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing the Basic Economic and Political Capacity of Iran in a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with China

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hadi Torki 1
  • Arsalan Ghorbani Sheikhneshin 2
1 , PhD in International Relations, Khwarazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
2 , Corresponding Author, Professor of International Relations, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The relations between Iran and China have had ups and downs throughout history, which have never ended in complete enmity. The relations between the two countries have entered a new form in the past decade, which has led to "comprehensive strategic partnership" between them. With the introduction of a comprehensive strategic partnership and a 25-year contract between the two countries, political and economic convergence has been relatively improving. Comprehensive strategic partnership through Western sanctions and Iran's turning away from the West and Tehran's approach of looking to the East, intensifying the blockade of oil sales and reducing trade exchanges by sanctions, China's need to partner with Iran in order to complete the Belt and Road Project and supply energy and develop exports. , the counter-hegemony approach of Iran and China and the mental and historical commonality of the leaders from colonialism has brought economic and political convergence between Iran and China, which is the purpose of this article to investigate and analyze the cause of these convergences and capacities. The research method in this article is descriptive-explanatory.

Introduction

The relationship between Tehran and Beijing is due to the geopolitical and economic situation and the requirements of the international system, which is tied to "national interests". The depth of relations between China and Iran after the revolution of Mao and the Islamic revolution has shared international identities that have a place in the historical understanding and mentality of the people of the two countries. Considering the regional and international situation and its requirements, as well as the conditions of the two countries, the two countries have tried to develop bilateral cooperation, which results in cooperation in the form of; The "comprehensive strategic partnership" manifested in the 25-year contract that can be in line with the policies of both sides to complete the Belt and Road.

Theoretical Framework

In this article, we have used the theories of convergence, cognitive evolution and counter-hegemony. In fact, with Adler's theory of convergence and cognitive theory, we have believed in a kind of alignment between Iran and China, that their approach, in addition to seeking benefits, through knowledge, they try to "change" the international order, which includes a "counter-hegemony" nature. One of the reasons for looking to the east is by Iran, which has played an effective role in the form of comprehensive strategic partnership. On the other hand, China, considering its goals in the international system, which is opposing unilateralism, is one of the methods of this country, it is trying to enter into convergence and cooperation with different countries through partnerships and not "alliances" in such a way as to reduce tensions within the framework of the international system. Not be created and the framework of the countries in question should have a peaceful procedure.

Methodology

The research method in this article is descriptive-explanatory, and the data of the article is of the library and internet type, which was done in the form of Taking notes.

Results & Discussion

First, he sees the comprehensive strategic partnership between Iran and China in several dimensions, for example, he does not consider Iran's need to sell oil as an important factor, and he does not consider China's alignment with Iran to be merely economic, and he emphasizes that the approach of the two countries can be used to counter hegemony. Second, he has considered the capacities of this partnership beyond the normal capacities of this type of China's partnerships with other countries. Third, in the article, we see a kind of holism and comprehensiveness of participation, which can be seen in many neglected aspects of the works in line with this scientific work. Fourth, the article is based on the idea that if Iran was able to curb the Western sanctions and did not face the West's bad promises, maybe the view of the East would not be so strong. Also, in the article, from a theoretical point of view, a kind of meta-theory has been used, and in a way, it is a dimension of the theory of format over method, format in theories of international relations, but has used a kind of conceptual model, and in other words, it is a theory of format over method and data. Which can be said: propositions are arranged based on analysis.  Iran currently has an urgent and fundamental need due to the discussion of sanctions against China and the sale of oil for the purpose of domestic and foreign financing, China also understands well both the position of Iran and the capacities that Iran has in the region.

Conclusions & Suggestions

Considering China's economic approach, as well as the anti-hegemonic approach and the approach of looking to the east of Iran, which was caused by ideological, economic and political blockade from the West, Iran and China have tried to have a growing trend in political and economic alignment with China, which initially It started through a comprehensive strategic partnership and led to a 25-year contract, and the two countries can have a new approach in the form of a comprehensive strategic partnership, taking into account the international conditions and requirements, as well as understanding the environment, considering the gaps of liberal power in global politics. Against the policies of the West and America in the region and the world. China has tried to become an active actor in the region, especially in West Asia, mostly through performance and movement within the current and structural frameworks and using international organizations, and Iran mostly with a philosophical character and outlook, and of course within its limits and according to its own requirements.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Economic and Political Convergence
  • Comprehensive Strategic Partnership
  • Iran
  • China
Abbasi Khoshkar, A. (2022). Evolutionary China's Foreign Policy Identity and The Strategy of Institution Making Order In The Post-Mao Period. Iranian Research letter of International Politics, 11(1), 247-267. [In Persian]
Abbasi, M. Ghiyasi, A. (2012). China Foreign Policy in the Third Millennium: Economic Implementations and Peaceful Foreign Policy in International Relations. World Studies Quarterly, 2(2), 321-357. [In Persian]
Adler, E. (2019). World Ordering a Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution, Published online by Cambridge University.
Adkin, L. (2022). Hegemony & Counter-Hegemony, https://doi.org/10.22215/stkt/al18.
Altun, S. (2015). Debating the Neoliberal Transformation in People’s Republic of China: Washington Consensus and Beyond, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen
Arghavani Pirsalami, F. Pirankhou, S. (2017). New Silk Road as China's Foreign Policy Strategy: Opportunities and Threats for Iran. Foreign Relations, 9(3), 7-42. [In Persian]
Bahrami Moghadam, S. (2018). China's Encounter with the Modern West: Refusal, ‎Learning and Transformation. International Relations Researches, 8(1), 95-125. [In Persian]
Breslin, Sh. (2010). A Handbook of China's International Relations. London: Routledge.
Callco, D. (1987). Beyond American Hegemony: The Future of the Western Alliance, Published by Basic Books.
Chegani Zadeh, G. A. (2014). Iran, the Islamic World and Change in the Geometry of International Power. Political Strategic Studies, 2(7), 69-92. [In Persian]
Corneliussen, A. (2022). 25-Year China - Iran Strategic Agreement charts China – Iran Economic Corridor: Architecture & Implications.
Cox, R. W. (1987). Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History, Millennium, 10(2), 126-155.
Daftari, M. (1995). "An analysis of Iran-China relations". Foreign Policy Journal, 9(1), Strategic Studies Research Institute. [In Persian]
Fallahi, E. Omidi, A. (2017). Change and Continuity in China's Development Oriented Foreign Policy in Xi Jinping Era. Political and International Approaches, 9(1), 147-178. [In Persian]
Faltzgraf, R. Deorty, J. (2008). Conflicting theories in international relations, translators: Vahid Zaghiri, Alireza Tayeb, Tehran, Nash Qoms. [In Persian]
Ghasemi, F. (2012). Theories of International Relations, Tehran, Mizan Publishing. [In Persian]
Ghazizadeh, Sh. Talebifar, A. (2010). Strategic relations between Iran and China, Tehran, Strategic Studies Research Institute Publications. [In Persian]
Gramsci, A. (1971). Hegemony, Intellectuals and steak: selections from prison Notebooks, London.
Hafeznia, M. (2010). Theory of the emerging geopolitical structure of the world. Geopolitics Quarterly, 6(19), 1-37. [In Persian]
Hasan Khani, M. H. Masrour, M. (2017). China's Rise: US Challenges Facing China's Increasing Power in International Relations. International Relations Researches, 7(24), 159-184. [In Persian]
Hosseini Matin, M. (2018). Trump and the need to rebuild the international order of liberal democracy, Foreign Policy Quarterly, 33(1), 5-44. [In Persian]
Ikenberry, G. John and Kupchan, Charles A. (1990), Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization, 44(3), 283-315.
Jacopo, S. (2022). China-Iran Relations through the Prism of Sanctions, Asian Affairs, 53:1, 87-105, DOI: 10.1080/03068374.2022.2029060.
Jansiz, A. Pirmohammadi, S. (2020). Analysis of the possibility or refusal of a comprehensive strategic partnership in Iran-China relations. World Politics, 8(4), 93-120. [In Persian]
Javier, V, Leonardo, R. Pedro, N. (2014). The international implications of the Chinese model of development in the Global South: Asian Consensus as a network power. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 57, 91-107.
Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma. World politics, 30(2), 167-214.
Kaufman, S. Wohlforth, W. Little, R. (2007). The Balance of Power in World History, Cambridge University Press.
Kazemi, A. (2005). International relations in theory and practice, Tehran, Qoms, fourth edition. [In Persian]
Khoshkar, A. (2022). Consensus building and Order building in Japan's foreign policy after the Cold War; Possible futures. Strategic Futures Studies, 1(2), 83-114. [In Persian]
Kolaeei, E. Niknam, R. (2015). Strategic Challenge of China and the United States over Global Hegemony. Political Strategic Studies, 3(11), 161-182. [In Persian].
Layne, C. (2006). The unipolar illusion revisited: the coming end of the United State’s unipolar Moment, Published By: The MIT Press, 2006(31), 7-41.
Masroor, M. Khani, M. (2018). Geopolitical Rearrangement in the South China Sea. Geopolitics Quarterly, 14(50), 168-196. [In Persian]
Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
Nematpour, A., & Reisinezhad, A. (2023). America in Transformation: Domestic Trends and Turns in Foreign Policy. International Relations Researches, 13(3), 131-157. doi: 10.22034/irr.2023.188209 [In Persian]
Narimani, G, Kazemi, M. Sadeghi, Sh. (2017). An analysis of strategies and tools to consolidate and expand China's soft power, International Relations Studies Quarterly, 11(43). [In Persian]
New York: Columbia University Press.
North, D. C. (2015). A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Written Human History, Political Economy of Comprehensive Development, 1(3), 151-92. [In Persian]
North, D. C. (2015). Economic performance over time, Strategy Quarterly, 2015(8), translation: Mehdi Be Niaz. [In Persian]
Peymani, A, Azarain, A. (2021). A comprehensive review of the 25-year contract between Iran and China, Office of Strategic Studies for Production Development, Imam Sadeq University. [In Persian]
Pournajafi, V. S. Shariati, S. (2015). The Strategic Capacity of Iran in the Peaceful Rise Doctrine of China. Geopolitics Quarterly, 11(39), 139-169. [In Persian]
Pourqiyumi, A. (2009). Examining the concept of hegemony; Emphasizing American hegemony, Defense Policy. 17(67), 49-79. [In Persian]
Rasooli Sani Abadi, E. Roostaei, M. (2016). China's Smart Power Strategy. Political Research, 6(2), 35-53. [In Persian]
Rasouli Saniabadi, E, Askari, A. (2015). Examining the direction of revisionism in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2005-2013). Foreign Policy Quarterly, 30(4), 121-150. [In Persian]
Rekabian, R. Alepour, M. Gorbane, V. (2022). Investigating the relations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and China through the perspective of strategic culture. Political and International Approaches, 13(4), 205-230. [In Persian]
Salehi, J, Heshmatian, R. (2017). The position of the international system in the interactions between Iran and China and the advancement of Iran's national interests. National Interest Studies Quarterly, 4(13), 125-155. [In Persian]
Shafiee, N. (2022). Analysis of the 25-Year Iran-China agreement in the Light of China’s foreign policy Developments. International Political Economy Studies, 5(1), 175-200. [In Persian]
Shaeri Karimi, M., Karimifard, H., Ameri Golestani, H., & Mohaghegh Nia, H. (2023). The Challenge of American Politics in Eurasia with the Emerging Power of China. International Relations Researches, 13(2), 7-30. doi: 10.22034/irr.2023.376350.2313 [In Persian]
Shahandeh, B. (1995). China's Middle East Policy Relying on Open Doors, Middle East Quarterly, 2(4). [In Persian]
Sharafkhani, M. Hajimineh, R. Dehshiri, M. R. (2022). China's economic strategy in hegemonic competition with the United States in the Middle East. Political Strategic Studies, 11(40), 67-106. [In Persian]
Shariatinia, M. (2022). Irans full membership in the SCO: Economic and Security implications. Political and International Approaches, 13(3), 35-56. [In Persian]
Shariatinia, M. Masoudi, H. (2019). China and International Orders. World Politics, 8(3), 7-32. [In Persian]
Shirkhani, M. A. (2013). Pragmatic Foreign policy and Economic Growth (Case Study: China 1978-2010). Strategic Studies of public policy, 4(12), 133-164. [In Persian]
Shirkhani, M. Arghavani Pirsalami, F. (2016). Beijing Consensus: New Model of Development in Globalised Age. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 46(1), 129-149. [In Persian]
Sotoudeh, M. (2010). The foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the structure of the system, Political Science Quarterly, 16. [In Persian]
Valigholi Zadeh, A. Zaki, Y. (2008). A Study of Geopolitical and Geo-economic Status of Iran Vis-à-vis CIS Countries. Geopolitics Quarterly, 4(13), 21-56. [In Persian]
Yu, H. (2017). Motivation behind China’s One Belt, One Road Initiatives and Establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Journal of Contemporary China, 2017(26), 353-368.
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Walt, M. (1987). The Origins of Alliances, Ithaca: Cornel University Press.  https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt32b5fc