گذار جهانی‌شدن به ملی‌گرایی؛ ایالات متحده آمریکا و چین در نظم جهانی پساکووید-19

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

2 نویسنده مسئول، دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

همه‌گیری کووید-19 بحث‌ها را جریان غالب و عمده پارادیم نظری روابط بین‌الملل در مورد تغییر اساسی نظم اقتصادی جهان دستخوش تشدید کرده است. دیدگاه لیبرالیسم ادامه جهانی‌شدن اقتصادی را پس از همه‌گیری پیش‌بینی می‌کنند، جریان غالب واقع‌گرایی با توجه به پیامدهای منفی ساختاری این همه‌گیر بر اقتصاد جهانی، به‌جای جهانی‌شدن انتظار ملی‌گرایی را دارند. از این رو، این پژوهش درصدد پاسخگویی به سؤال مبنی بر اینکه کووید-19 چه تاثیری می‌تواند بر فرآیند نظم اقتصادی جهانی در حال شدن داشته باشد؟ روش این پژوهش با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی است و از تحلیل‌ آمار‌ها، مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و اسنادی برای پاسخ به پرسش اصلی استفاده شده است. فرضیه پژوهش این است جهانی‌شدن اقتصادی از زمان بحران مالی 2008 در حال گذار بوده است و یکی از عوامل مهم اما نه انحصاری برای توضیح این تغییر، روابط اقتصادی در حال تحول ایالات‌متحده و چین است که از همزیستی به سمت رقابتی فزاینده کشانده شده است. بازسازی اقتصادی در ایالات‌متحده و چین پس از عبور از بحران سال 2008 و شتاب گرفتن از زمان شروع جنگ تجاری و کووید-19 آغاز شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Transition From Globalization to Nationalism; United States and China in the Post-COVID World Order-19

نویسندگان [English]

  • َAliakbar Jafari 1
  • Mehrdad Falah 2
1 Professor, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
2 Corresponding Author, Ph.D. Student of International Relations, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The Covid-19 epidemic has intensified debates over the dominant theoretical paradigm of international relations about the fundamental change in the world economic order. The liberal view predicts the continuation of economic globalization after the epidemic. The dominant current of realism expects nationalism instead of globalization, given the negative structural consequences of this epidemic on the global economy. Therefore, this study seeks to answer the question of what effect Covid-19 can have on the process of global economic order? The method of this research is descriptive-analytical and statistical analysis, library studies and documents have been used to answer the main question. The research hypothesis is that economic globalization has been in transition since the 2008 financial crisis, and one important but non-exclusive factor in explaining this change is the evolving economic relationship between the United States and China, which has shifted from coexistence to increasing competitiveness. Economic reconstruction in the United States and China has begun since the 2008 crisis and accelerated since the start of the Trade War and the Covid-19.

Introduction

While globalization and its various dimensions have challenged the Westphalian system and the traditional concepts of sovereignty resulting from it, the COVID-19 pandemic has intensified the debates on the dominant movement and the main theoretical paradigm of international relations concerning the fundamental change in the world economic order. The liberal perspective predicts that economic globalization will continue in the post-Covid-19 era. Taking into account the negative structural outcomes of the pandemic on the international economy, the dominant realism movement expects nationalism to come to the forefront instead of globalization. Consequently, the present research intended to answer this question: What effects can COVID-19 have on the world economic order that is being formed? It used the descriptive analytical method, analysis of the data, library resources, and documentary studies to answer the question. The research hypothesis is that economic globalization has been going through a transition since the financial crisis in 2008, and one of the important factors for explaining this transition is the change in US-China economic relations from coexistence to increasing competitiveness. Economic restructuring started in the US and China after they got out of the crisis in 2008 and accelerated since the trade war and COVID-19 began. The findings of this research indicate that the post-COVID-19 world will be characterized by intensification of nationalistic competitions between countries over recovering economic power and political influence.      

Theoretical Framework

From a realist point of view, the basic principles of international politics never change. The international order is always essentially a struggle for power among governments for their own interests. Since there is no single realist theory, the various branches of realism rely on different independent variables. Classical realists such as Has Morgenthau believe that permanent conflicts have their roots in the inherently selfish nature of humans and turn into the behavior of competitive governments. Neo-realists including Kenneth Waltz focus on a competitive international system that is inherently without the authority of central organization and monopolizes power to manage the inter-government relations and protect countries from each other. In this anarchical international system, governments are the main actors that use self-help strategies for their survival and, depending on the related neorealism branch, for maximization of their power or security. Due to the inevitable asymmetric power distribution, the anarchical conditions in the international system may force weaker states to either balance their relations with the more powerful countries or to go along with them. Neoclassical realists connect the systemic assumptions of neorealism to the domestic factors, such as domestic institutions, state-society relations and the leadership perception, that facilitate or limit foreign policy. The liberal theory highlights the need for cooperation by emphasizing mutual dependence, transnationalism and growth of international institutions and democracy. Liberalists argue that, when the fates of states are intertwined, they must cooperate or pay a very high price. For example, the international economy is a complex trade, financial and production network that prioritizes cooperation. From this perspective, states must cooperate to prevent the epidemics that affect the entire world and impose heavy costs on all societies. The states must share their knowledge and material resources to cope with scourges that harm them all. They will certainly do this; in short, this pattern optimistically emphasizes that COVID-19 will not destroy globalization. This general pattern of elements and their interactions thus form the structure of the liberal political system and hence whenever one or several of these elements confront instability the system that they have built weakens. Some believe now that the corona crisis is an effective factor in weakening these elements. Accordingly, the relatively low levels of mutual dependence in the midst of COVID-19 prevalence did not lead to high levels of cooperation because it would be accompanied by threats to national survival.            

Methodology

This was a descriptive and analytical study that used data analysis, library resources and documentary studies to answer the main research question.

Results and Discussion

COVID-19, which is called the third crisis of the third millennium in extent and depth after the September 11 attacks and the 2008 economic crisis, caused major changes in global politics and world economy and influenced the world order in addition to challenging the efficiency, competency and eligibility of states. Although COVID-19 seems to be a health crisis at first glance, its geopolitical effects cannot be ignored. COVID-19 pandemic has had particularly substantial effects on two arenas of life on earth: world economy and security, the main manifestation of which will be the shaping up of the future world order. Consequently, COVID-19 astonishingly pulled the brake on global economic growth. In this regard, the present research has two key findings. The first one is economic globalization that has been in transition since the financial crisis in 2008 and one of the important factors that explain this transition is the changing US-China economic relations, which have shifted from coexistence to increasing competitiveness. In fact, the economic restructuring in the US and China started after they went through the crisis in 2008 and with the beginning of the trade war and COVID-19. The second one is that a better understanding of nationalism and regionalism has been achieved in the vacuum caused by the declining globalization through the long term effects of COVID-19 on the world economic system      

Conclusions & Suggestions

This article argued that the world economy experienced a U-shaped improvement after the 2008 crisis, and some basic changes occurred in the nature of economic globalization during the past decade. The expression "slowing down" is quite accurately describes the new economic globalization, and the change in US-China economic relations from coexistence to increasing competitiveness is one of the important factors for describing this change. More importantly, by studying the different forms of production and trade activities during the past decade, the article showed that nationalism and regionalism filled the vacuum of economic globalization during the past decade, and we are now accepting an emerging multipolar world being dominated by at least three large areas: North America, Europe and China-centered Asia. The article confirms this and suggests that the US-China tariff war and COVID-19 pandemic are not the beginning but the accelerator or catalyst of this more general trend. It offers a more accurate study of economic globalization during the past two decades and an outlook for understanding the effects of the US-China tariff war and COVID-19 pandemic on the world economic order. Finally, in order to study more specifically how regionalization has evolved during the past several years, we must differentiate the various networks of value chain production into the three types of the domestic, the regional and the global value chains. In general, the more regional the value chain is, the higher the level of economic integration into the global economy will be. We can then calculate more accurately the relative importance of nationalism by measuring and comparing the shares of the domestic, regional and global value chains based on the World Input Database.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Globalization
  • Regionalism
  • US-China Relations
  • Covid-19
 
Andersson, Johanna, Achim Berg, Saskia Hedrich, & Karl-Hendrik, Magnus )2018(. Is apparel manufacturing coming home? Nearshoring, automation, and sustainability – Establishing a demandfocused apparel value chain.McKinsey & Company”, (observed:2021/10/11), Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey. com/industries/retail/our-insights/is-apparel-manufacturing-coming-home.
Apuzzo M, Kirkpatrick D (2020). Covid-19 changed how the world does science together. New York Times 1 April. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/01/world/europe/coronavirus-science-research cooperation.html?
Basrur, Rajesh & Kliem, Frederick (2021). Covid-19 and international cooperation: IR paradigms at odds, Public health information. Published doi: 10.1007/s43545-020-00006-4.
Chodor T (2020). Missing in action: The G20 in the Covid crisis. Interpreter. (observed:2021/10/06),. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/missing-action-g20-covid-crisis.
Furman, Jernej. (2020). Coronavirus hasn’t killed globalisation – It proves why we need it. The Conversation, (observed: 2021/09/11), Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/ -why-we-need-it-135077.
García-Herrero, A. and J. Tan. (2020). Deglobalisation in the context of United States-China Decoupling. Policy Contribution N*21, Bruegel.
Ghorbani Sheikh Nashin, Arslan and Ahmadinejad, Hamid (2022). The post-corona philosophical system from the perspective of realism, liberalism and critical theory; Condemned, Platform and Harriet scenarios. Journal of Philosophical Research, Volume 16, Number 39, Fall, pp. 678-695. [In Persian]
Ikenberry, John. (2020). The next liberal order: The age of contagion demands more internationalism, not less. Foreign Affairs, 99 (4): 133–142.
J.P. Morgan. (2020). What will the recovery look like from the COVID-19 recession?. (Observed: 2021/10/14), Retrieved from https://www.jpmorgan.com/global/research/2020-covid19-recession-recovery.
James K. Jackson. (2021). Global Economic Effects of COVID-19. Congressional Research Service, at: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/R46270.pdf.
Joseph S. Nye. (2020). Post-Pandemic Geopolitics. project syndicate.availabe At: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/five-scenarios-for-international-order-in-2030-by-joseph-s-nye-2020-10.
Khalifa A. F. (2021). Realism and International Relations: Evaluating the Brought Back of Political Realism During the Corona virus, Sultan Qaboos University: College of Economics and Political Sciences.
Khodakhah Azar, Samia and Mousavi Shafaei, Massoud, Tajik, Mohammad Reza, Islami, Mohsen (2022). "The Genealogy of the Liberal World Order: Exploring the Trajectories of Power." World Politics Quarterly, World Politics, Volume 11, Issue 4, 42, pp. 221-258. [In Persian]
Khoshkar, Amir (2019).Metaanalysis of the capacity to regulate the global epidemic of Corona disease. Strategic Research Institute, extraction date: 22/06/2022. https://csr.ir/fa/news/869. [In Persian]
Kissinger, Henry A. (2020). The coronavirus pandemic will forever alter the world order. The Wall Street Journal, (observed:2021/11/11), Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-coronavirus-pandemic-will-foreveralter- the-world-order-11585953005.
Mahmoudi Kia, Mahmoud. (1400). The Post-Industrial World; Social China or the continuation of America-centricity in international relations. Shahreza Political and International Research Quarterly, No. 48, Fall, pp. 71-91. [In Persian]
Menti, Hossein. (2019). Investigating the effects of the Covid-19 virus on the global economy. Social Impact Assessment Quarterly, Volume 1, Number 2, pp. 163-181. [In Persian]
Mordecai, Mara (2020). How Americans envision a post-pandemic world order. available at: https://pewrsr.ch/2XpVYFX.
Niakoi, Amir (1400). Effects of governments' policies in the face of the Covid-19 crisis (a comparative study of the experiences of America, China and Iran). International Relations Research, Volume 11, Number 2. pp. 41-68. [In Persian]
Patrick, Stewart. (2020). When the system fails: COVID-19 and the costs of global dysfunction. Foreign Affairs, 99 (4): 40–50. ID: covidwho-612370.
Paulson, Henry. (2020). Save globalisation to secure the future. Financial Times. (observed: 2021/10/1), Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/da1f38dc-7fbc-11ea-b0fb-13524ae1056b.
Schult C. (2020) Streit über ‘Wuhan-Virus. Der Spiegel 24, March. https://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/streit-um-wuhan-virus-a-6bb570bb-9f2b-4cd1-a895-fdeabf53f6b4.
Taherinia, Masoud and Hassanvand, Ali. (2019). Economic consequences of the Covid-19 disease on Iran's economy; Emphasis on employment. Nursing Management Quarterly, Volume 9, Number 3, pp. 43-58. [In Persian]
Tellis, Ashley J. (2020).Covid-19 Knocks on American Hegemony. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1-10.
The Guardian (2020a). Just when Italy really needed some unity, the EU failed it and continues to do so. (observed:2021/07/21), https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/19/european-union-italy-unity-failure-debt-germany-netherlands
Tunali, borke .(2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Economic, Social, and Political Impacts, Istanbul University Press, DOI :10.26650/B/SS46.2020.006.
Wang, Yong. (2020). The Sino-US Relations and Global Great Changes under the Pandemic. (Pangoal), accessed June 2, 2021, https://ishare.ifeng.com/c/s/v002gWw9LSxl9U-_xlbAYfxgjdOsRPZf3Nj6mIAR3GLLM2JY.
Wang, Zhaohui & Sun, Zhiqiang. (2021). From Globalization to Regionalization: The United States, China, and the Post-Covid-19 World Economic Order. Journal of Chinese Political Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09706-3.
World Bank Group.(2019). Global Value Chain Development Report 2019: Technological Innovation. Supply Chain Trade, and Workers in a Globalized World, (observed:2021/08/1), Retrieved from http://documents. worldbank.org/curated/en/384161555079173489/.
Zhao, Suisheng. (2021). Rhetoric and Reality of China’s Global Leadership in the Context of COVID-19: Implications for the US-led World Order and Liberal Globalization. Journal of Contemporary China, 30:128, 233-248, DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2020.1790900.