تحلیل اکتشافی-ساختاری برسازی خطر امنیتی ایران نزد اعراب توسط عربستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مطالعات منطقه ای، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 دکتری گروه علوم سیاسی، واحد بین المللی خرمشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خرمشهر، ایران.

3 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

چکیده

پویایی ماهوی، برهم‌کنش منافع، تکثر بازیگران و تغییرات جهانی در الگوهای امنیتی کشورها باعث شده است تا منطقه غرب آسیا در دهه‌های اخیر شاهد تغییرات رادیکال امنیتی باشد. اما یکی از مهم‌ترین این تغییرات امنیتی، تضاد امنیتی بین ایران و عربستان در سطح پراگماتیک بوده است که با کنش‌گری عربستان، برسازی خطر امنیتی از ایران و اجماع سازی در بین اعراب، بر پیچیدگی‌های امنیتی منطقه افزود و علاوه بر ایران و عربستان منافع حیاتی بسیاری از کشورهای عربی را تحت تأثیر قرارداد. علیرغم این مهم، تحقیقات پرداخته شده به این موضوع اندک و اغلب دارای نقیصه روشی و معرفتی بوده است. بر همین اساس، تحقیق حاضر تلاش کرده است تا با کاربست نظریه برسازی امنیتی در مکتب کپنهاگ و استخدام برخی نوآوری‌های روش‌شناسی در علوم انسانی، به ویژه تحلیل تلفیقی اکتشافی و تحلیل کیفی ساختاری و استفاده از روش‌های اعتباربخشی نرم‌افزاری و نخبگانی، ضمن شناسایی مؤلفه‌ها و متغیرهای مؤثر در برسازی خطر امنیتی ایران، ماهیت این متغیرها را شناسایی کند و متناسب با آن راهبردهایی را پیشنهاد دهد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که برسازی خطر امنیتی ایران در سه محور اصلی هستی‌شناسی (شامل 2 متغیر)، معرفت‌شناسی (شامل 4 متغیر) و روش‌شناسی (شامل 7 متغیر) اتفاق افتاده است. همچنین، نتایج تحلیل ساختاری حاکی از توزیع این متغیرها در دسته‌های متغیرهای حیاتی، هدف، ریسک، خروجی و اهرمی است. یافته‌های حاصل‌شده از دیدگاه نظریه تحقیق و واقعیت‌های محیطی مورد تحلیل بسیط قرار گرفت.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

An Exploratory-Structural Analysis of Securitization of Irans' Threat in Arab Countries

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyyed Mohammad Rreza Mousavi 1
  • Yaser Ershad Manesh 2
  • Sajjad Ali Mirzaei 3
1 PhD student of Regional Studies, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Ph.D. Department of Political Science, Khoramshahr International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khoramshahr, Iran.
3 M.A in Political Science Department, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Inherent dynamism, the interaction of interests, multiplicity of actors, and universal adjustment in the security patterns of countries has brought about radical security changes in the west Asia region in the last decade. Among them, however, the security contradiction between Iran and Saudi Arabia has been amongst the most important ones that, due to Saudi’s part role in constructing Iran as a security threat among Arabs, added to the security intricacies of the region and in addition to the parties involved, affected some Arab countries to a greater extent. Despite that, the literature studying this issue is scarce and the thin bulk of research conducted around it suffers from some methodological and epistemological deficiencies. Thus, the present research has been an attempt to employ the theory of security construction in Copenhagen school and employ some methodological innovations in humanities, particularly exploratory and structural interpretation, and validating findings through appropriate software and experts’ judgment to identify main components and variables in this threat construction. It was revealed that Saudi’s construction of Iran as a threat had three main components of ontology (including 2 variables), epistemology (including 4 variables), and methodology (including 7 variables). Also, structural interpretation showed that these variables are distributed in a group of critical variables, target variables, risk variables, output variables and leverage variables. These findings were discussed from a variety of perspectives.

Introduction

Security patterns in the Middle East have undergone significant changes over the past decades, particularly after the Iranian Islamic revolution. Iran and Arab countries have been in the middle of these shifts due to their complex interactions with regional countries, the West, and the Zionist regime. Among these changes, the security conflict between Iran and Saudi Arabia was the one that not only had negative effects on both countries but also had devastating effects on Syria, Yemen, and Iraq. This was primarily the result of Saudi Arabia's efforts to securitize Iran's threat in Arab countries. Despite the significance of this topic, few studies have been conducted, and the ones that have been done suffer from obscurity or methodological flaws. Therefore, the present study aimed to adopt a robust theoretical framework and avoid previously reported methodological flaws to investigate this securitization's principal components and variables. To that end, the primary inquiry should be, "What are the main components and variables in Saudi Arabia's securitization of Iran's threat in Arab countries, and what the nature of each variable is?"
 

Theoretical Framework

The current research was enlightened by the "securitization" framework of the Copenhagen school, which was first devised by Buzzan et al. (1998). According to this theory, securitization results from two primary factors: the manifestation of the threat, most importantly, the perception of the threat as existential, and public acceptance of the threat. This theory postulates that using securitized language by political elites and the media is the primary tool for creating a threat and then instilling it as a security and existential threat. This theory also suggests that threat is not created as an internal process but rather as external and tangible evidence, such as military power.
 

Methodology

This study adopted a multi-phase and multi-methods design to answer the question. A systematic literature review and a semi-structured interview with a panel of experts were conducted during the initial qualitative phase. The findings underwent content analysis, and after the identification of components and themes, they underwent a quantitative phase including reliability estimation and exploratory factor analysis in which Eigenvalue and factor loading were used to extract components and variables of the securitization of Iran's threat in Arab countries. To shed light on the nature and weight of each variable in the system, a final qualitative phase was run in which obtained variables were rated in the structural interpretation of the cross-impact matrix. The results were reported as follows.  
     

Results & Discussion

 Based on the findings, it is clear that Saudi Arabia is employing a three-pronged strategy to securitize the Iranian threat in Arab countries. The first (ontological) dimension involves two variables: reinforcing the existential threat posed by the Shiite minority in Arab countries and highlighting the fundamental contradictions between Wahhabism and Shiism. The second dimension (epistemology) consists of four variables, including developing Arabs' collective political identity, emphasizing shared racial, cultural, and linguistic commonalities, stressing the threat of exporting a revolutionary model of governance to Arab countries, and underlining the threat of Iran's leadership over the Muslim world. The third dimension (methodological) entails seven variables, including highlighting the threat of non-state actors under the auspices of Iran, highlighting regional imbalance in favor of the Shiite crescent, extensive use of media for legitimizing Iranian's threat, shifting patterns of friendship-enmity, highlighting Iran's rivalry in the economic and energy sector, magnifying Iran's nuclear threat and missile program, and establishing inter-state and international coalitions and treaties.

Conclusions & Suggestions

After September 11 and the Arab uprising known as Arab Spring, Saudi Arabia's conflict with Iran entered a new phase and reached its peak. Due to the factors mentioned earlier, Saudi Arabia could gain the support of other Arab nations, which may exert serious impacts on the security, political, and economic status of all countries involved. These historical variables remain intact despite some rapprochement in the bilateral ties between the two nations. The structural interpretation of the findings revealed that each of these variables plays a unique regulatory role in the securitization system under study. Therefore, Iranian policymakers and authorities need to consider each behavior's weight, nature, and role in this system and then manipulate and invest in those variables that exert more extensive and less costly impacts. These findings have implications for researchers, practitioners, and strategists. Future studies are suggested to add a scenario writing phase to the findings of this and similar studies.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Securitization
  • Iran
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Structural Analysis
  • Copenhagen School
Ahmadian, H. (2016). Change in the Regional Policy of Saudi Arabia; Achievements of King Salman. Foreign Relations, 8(4), 108-113. [In Persian].
Akhavan Kazemi, B. (2000). Convergence and Divergence in the Relations of Iran and Saudi Arabia. Middle East Studies, 7(2), 121-132. [In Persian].
Alikhani, M. (2012). Investigating the Relationship between Eurpoian Union and Persian Gulf Cooperation Council. Political Science, 20 (2), 120-134. [In Persian].
Asadi, A.A. (2017). The Future of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Journal of Strategic Future Studies, 4(5), 48-56. [In Persian].
Altamamy, S.)2012(, Saudi Arabia and The Arab spring: opportunities and challenges of security. Journal of Arabian studies, 2(2), 121-156.
Buzan, B. et al., (1998). A New Framework for Analyzing Security. (Trans. Tayeb, A.). Tehran, Strategic Studies Research Institutuion. [In Persian]
Buzan, B., & Weaver, O. (2003). Regions and power: the Structure of International Security. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chernoff, F. (2014). Theory and Metatheory in International Relations. (Trans. Tayeb, A). Tehran, Ney. [In Persian]
Dehghani Firouzabadi, S. J., Rostami, F., & Daneshnia, F. (2021). Perspectives of Iran-Saudi Arabia relations; Future Scenarios and Solutions; Using the Delphi Method. World Politics, 10(2), 245-288
Dehghani Firoozabadi, S.J, & Ghorashi, S.Y. (2014). Arabs’ Approavch toward Iran’s Nuclear Program. Middle East Studies, 14 (2), 12-28. [In Persian]
Dehgani Firouzabadi, J., & Garashi, Y. (2013). Theory and method in securitization studies. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 15(58), 7-42. [In Persian]
Dornyei, Z. & Taguchi, (2010). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. Routledge, London.
Ebrahimi, N. (2015). Wahhabi Salafism, Identiy Distinctions between Saudi Arabia and Iran. National Studies Journal, 16(63), 145-160. [In Persian]
Ehteshhami, A. (2002). The foreign policy of Iran, in the foreign policies of Middle East, Boulder, Colynne Reiner.
Esposito, J.L. (1990). The Iranian Revolution: It’s Global Impact, (Trnas: Modir Sahnechi), Tehran, Baz. [In Persian]
Fawcett, L. (2016).  International Relations of the Middle East. (Trans, Sultaninejad, A). Ministery of Foreign Affairs, Iran. [In Persian]
Goldberg, J. (2016). The Obama Doctrine,” at: http:// www.Theatlantic.com.
Goldberg, J. (2018). Saudi Crown Prince: Iran's Supreme Leader 'Makes Hitler Look Good', at: http:// www.Theatlantic.com.
Grumet, T. (2015). New Middle East Cold War: Saudi Arabia and Iran's Rivalry. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University of Denver.
Hubbard, B. (2018). Saudi Crown Prince, on U.S. Visit, Urges Tough Line on Iran. New York Times, March 27, 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com 2018/03/27.
Katzman, K. (2019). Coalition-Building against Iran. Congressional Research Service, United sates.
Knudsen, O. (2001). Post-Copenhagen Security Studies. Security Dialogue, 32 (3). 355-368. [In Persian]
Nouralivand, Y. (2017). Saudi Arabia's Attempts to Rebuilding a Regional Balance with Iran. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 20(75), 133-158. [In Persian]
Mabon, S; Nasirzadeh, S & Alrefai, E. (2021). De-securitisation and Pragmatism in the Persian Gulf: The Future of Saudi-Iranian Relations. The International Spectator, 56:4, 66-83,
McDonald, M. (2008). Securitization and the Construction of Security. European journal of international relations, 14(4), 563-587.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2006). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Routledge.
Mirza, M. N., Abbas, H., & Qaisrani, I. H. (2021). Structural Sources of Saudi–Iran Rivalry and Competition for the Sphere of Influence. SAGE Open.
Nadem Mirza, M. U., Abbas, H., & Qaisrani, I. H. (2021). Structural Sources of Saudi–Iran Rivalry and Competition for the Sphere of Influence. SAGE Open, 11(3), 215824402110326.
Nadir, G. (2014). Resource Nationalism in the Persian Gulf: Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Durham University.
Salehi Najafabadi, A. et al., (2015). The Reasons for the Hegemonic Discourse of Shiaphobia and Iran-phobia According to Laclau and Mouffe. Quarterly Journal of Political Research in Islamic World, 2 (5). 192-205. [In Persian]
Safari-Anaraki, M. (2015). Causes of Divergence in Iran and Saudi Arabia’s relation emphasizing the Menna Ctastroph. International Journal of Nations Research, 2(3), 40-52. [In Persian]
Settembrini, M.M. (2019). The proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia: the case of the Yemeni Civil War. Unpublished master thesis, Lisboa University. 
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
Torabi, G. (2012). The Persian Gulf Cooperation Council and Iran’s Nuclear Program. Middle East Studies, 19(3), 9-36. [In Persian].
Toumi, H & Chief, B. (2016). Islamic military coalition holds first meeting in Riyadh. Gulf News. Retrieved from: https://gulfnews.com/world/ March 27.
Weddington, D. (2017). Rivalry in the Middle East: The History of Saudi-Iranian Relations and its Implications on American Foreign Policy. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Missouri State University.
Williams, M. C. (2003). Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics. International Studies Quarterly, 47(4), 515-516.